Save StorySave this storySave StorySave this story<\/p>\n
George Zhang thought OpenClaw could make him rich, even though he didn\u2019t really understand how the viral AI agent software worked. But he saw a video of a Chinese social media influencer demonstrating how it could be deployed to manage stock portfolios and make investment decisions autonomously. Zhang, who works in cross-border ecommerce in the Chinese city of Xiamen, was intrigued enough that he decided to try installing OpenClaw in late February.<\/p>\n
Zhang is one of the many people in China who got swept up in the craze over OpenClaw recently. Workshops teaching people how to use the AI agent have popped up in cities across the country, drawing crowds of hundreds. Tech companies are racing to integrate OpenClaw into their platforms, while local governments have announced subsidies for entrepreneurs building products with it. Late last week, images of grandpas and grandmas lining up to install the software went viral across the internet.<\/p>\n
After renting a cloud server from Tencent and buying a subscription to the Chinese large language model Kimi, Zhang could start chatting with his OpenClaw agent, or his \u201clobster,\u201d as many Chinese people call theirs. At first, Zhang tells me, he was impressed by the AI agent as he watched it quickly generate a long market analysis based on the latest breaking news. But a few days in, his lobster started slacking off, and it would generate only a basic outline of market trends instead of a detailed report. He asked OpenClaw to generate something like what it had done on the first day, to which the agent perpetually responded that it was \u201cworking on it\u201d before never returning any results.<\/p>\n
Zhang\u2019s conclusion was that OpenClaw is not designed for people like him who don't have any coding skills. \u201cIt would tell me I needed to configure the API port. But that\u2019s a technical task, not something I can do unless I had a tutorial walking me through it step-by-step,\u201c he says. In the end, he gave up on letting his lobster trade stocks, settling instead on asking it to aggregate AI industry news, which he used to build a social media content farm on WeChat.<\/p>\n
This week, I checked in with half a dozen users of OpenClaw in China about their experiences with the agent, and a clear picture of division emerged between the adopters who are technologically savvy and those who are not. People who are proficient in AI see OpenClaw as a game changer in productivity, but those with no technical background feel they were promised a miraculously powerful AI product that ultimately didn\u2019t deliver. But by the time the bubble burst, they had already started paying for cloud servers and LLM tokens.<\/p>\n
The real driver of the OpenClaw mania in China isn\u2019t everyday users, but rather the Chinese companies that stand to benefit financially from its widespread adoption. Major tech firms like Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance, Minimax, Moonshot, and Z.ai all saw the AI productivity FOMO as a rare chance to get normal people to start paying for AI services, and they are reaping the biggest rewards from it.<\/p>\n
\u201cA chatbot uses only a few hundred tokens per conversation; a single active OpenClaw instance can consume tens or even hundreds of times more tokens per day,\u201d says Poe Zhao, a tech analyst and founder of the newsletter Hello China Tech<\/em>. Every new user of OpenClaw is someone who\u2019s paying 24\/7 for LLM API calls. \u201cThat\u2019s why Tencent engineers were setting up tables outside headquarters to help people install the software for free,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n Song Zhuoqun, a college student in China, says she started running into problems with OpenClaw as soon as she tried installing it. Song is a social media intern at an AI startup but has no programming experience, so figuring out how to get OpenClaw running turned out to be difficult. She asked Doubao, ByteDance\u2019s popular AI chatbot, to generate a step-by-step tutorial for her, but it wasn\u2019t much help.<\/p>\n \u201cThere were pages full of code, and I couldn\u2019t understand any of it. I just kept asking the AI to generate a response for me, then I\u2019d paste it over, run it, and it would run into an error, so I\u2019d try a new response,\u201d she says. The installation ended up being the most frustrating part of trying out OpenClaw for Song, and she didn\u2019t feel like she learned anything from it.<\/p>\n Song\u2019s experience mirrors that of many people who jumped on the OpenClaw FOMO train lately. In China, it was hyped as a tool that any layperson could use to take advantage of AI technological progress, but the reality turned out to be very different. Even Changpeng Zhao, the multibillionaire founder of crypto exchange Binance, lamented on social media about how people \u201cclaim that you won't have to do anything else after installing the lobster, but all your time after installation is spent tweaking that useless lobster that can't do anything.\u201d<\/p>\n Rain Miao, a Chinese startup founder who has been using AI agents to build software products, is blunt about who shouldn\u2019t be using OpenClaw. \u201cIf you still can\u2019t figure out how to install it after a long time, and you don\u2019t even know how to handle the basic permissions, then you\u2019re probably better off not installing it at all,\u201d he says. Nontechnical users would benefit more from tools like Claude Cowork, Miao says, but those have gotten far less attention in China.<\/p>\n Most nontechnical users of OpenClaw have computers that are neither compatible with OpenClaw\u2019s working environment nor powerful enough to run AI models locally, so they have to rent cloud servers and pay for cloud-based LLM models to power it. (Or they can buy a Mac Mini like many people in Silicon Valley did, but that\u2019s even more expensive.)<\/p>\n Zhang broke down for me how much it cost him to run OpenClaw: Following the advice of online tutorials, he first rented a cloud server for a year from Tencent, then paid for a monthly subscription to Kimi for API access and some tokens. The onboarding process totaled about $30, and it would\u2019ve been even higher had he used OpenClaw to do complex tasks that eat up a large amount of tokens.<\/p>\n It\u2019s possible to run OpenClaw for less, but that also requires having the software programming experience to find work-arounds, says Miao. For example, he recommends delegating only the most difficult OpenClaw tasks to ChatGPT, which is more capable but also more expensive to run, and leave the repetitive work to Chinese domestic AI models. Miao also owns a powerful computer that can run some tasks locally, helping him further cut down on costs.<\/p>\n In recent days, some people have begun joking on Chinese social media that OpenClaw will eventually be replaced by unpaid interns\u2014you can dangle internship opportunities to get free student labor, but OpenClaw costs real tokens, a lot of them.<\/p>\n The most important takeaway from the OpenClaw frenzy is that it shows ordinary people in China are willing to pay for AI. That\u2019s surprising because most of the population is accustomed to getting software for free in exchange for their data and advertising attention. But OpenClaw adopters have proven they are enthusiastic or desperate enough to pay for cloud servers and API calls without hesitation. It\u2019s no surprise that Chinese companies are fully embracing that momentum, offering free installation services and livestreamed tutorials.<\/p>\n At the same time, since OpenClaw is an open-source software, virtually every major Chinese tech company has been rushing to make their own customized version of it. There\u2019s Tencent\u2019s QClaw, ByteDance\u2019s ArkClaw, Moonshot\u2019s KimiClaw, and Z.ai\u2019s AutoClaw. The companies claim their versions are easier to install and natively integrate with apps that people are already using, but they are clearly aimed at locking people inside their product ecosystems.<\/p>\n Earlier this week, Peter Steinberger, the founder of OpenClaw expressed his disapproval about what the Chinese tech companies were doing. \u201cThey copy yet they don't support the project in any way,\u201d he commented under an X post about Tencent hosting OpenClaw features locally, followed by a sad face emoji.<\/p>\n Many of the social events in China promoting OpenClaw were hosted by the same people that organize crypto events. Instead of selling Web3.0, those communities are now pivoting to Web4.0, or the agentic internet.<\/p>\n Savvy technical engineers have also found a lucrative market niche installing OpenClaw for other people. One person told MIT Technology Review that he has installed the AI agent over 7,000 times for about $34 a pop.<\/p>\n Even local Chinese governments moved quickly to capitalize on the hype. Despite the fact that OpenClaw is widely known to have security risks, at least five local governments in China so far have jumped at the opportunity to dole out money to OpenClaw developers.<\/p>\n It looked like an official endorsement of OpenClaw but was more likely an opportunistic attempt by local governments to signal that they welcome tech talent and can speak its language. Back in 2022, I covered how local governments were promoting the Metaverse by paying companies to build digital replicas of their cities. I doubt they are receiving many tourists in 2026.<\/p>\n This is an edition of<\/em> Zeyi Yang<\/strong><\/em><\/a> and<\/em> Louise Matsakis\u2019<\/strong><\/em> Made in China newsletter<\/strong><\/em><\/a>. Read previous newsletters<\/em> here.<\/strong><\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Save StorySave this storySave StorySave this story George Zhang thought OpenClaw could make him rich, even though he didn\u2019t really understand how the viral AI agent software worked. But he saw a video of a Chinese social media influencer demonstrating how it could be deployed to manage stock portfolios and make investment decisions autonomously. Zhang, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":47511,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-47510","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-business"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/agooka.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47510","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/agooka.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/agooka.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/agooka.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/agooka.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47510"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/agooka.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47510\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/agooka.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/47511"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/agooka.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47510"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/agooka.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47510"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/agooka.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47510"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\u201cI Couldn\u2019t Understand Any of It\u201d<\/h2>\n
Token Costs<\/h2>\n
The Real Winners<\/h2>\n
Who Else is Cashing In<\/h2>\n